The Equity Tape — Late July 2026

Start with the uncomfortable part

On 6 July the composite regime score read +6, BULLISH. On 30 July the Nasdaq 100 is 2.0% lower on the day, semiconductors are down 4.8%, and industrials — the sector I flagged as making new 52-week highs — are down 3.2%. The framework was not positioned for this.

It's worth being precise about how it was wrong, because that determines whether the process needs changing or simply needs following. The score is a monthly, mechanical read of medium-term conditions. It is not designed to catch a three-week momentum unwind, and it didn't. Two of its inputs — labour (bearish) and volatility (downgraded to neutral on rising realised vol) — were already flashing caution. The breadth input, which read bullish on the XLI 52-week high, is the one that has aged worst.

Where the tape actually is

1. This is not a rotation. It's a de-risking

The distinction matters enormously for what you do next. In a rotation, money leaves one sector and arrives in another; the index holds up and leadership changes. That's what markets were doing in the spring.

Today, equities are down and long bonds are at a 52-week low and crypto is soft. When stocks and bonds fall together, the driver is usually not growth fear — growth fear buys bonds. It's a repricing of discount rates and a reduction in gross exposure. Only energy (+1.9%) and gold (+0.5%) are meaningfully green.

The single most informative line in that table is TLT at a 52-week low. That removes the usual shock absorber. A balanced portfolio has no hiding place in a session like this, which mechanically forces further de-grossing — and that's what produces the disorderly, everything-correlated tape.

2. Mechanically oversold, and that cuts both ways

The Nasdaq 100's daily readings: RSI 32.4, stochastic %K at 8.7, CCI −183, MACD at −10.85 versus a −5.90 signal line, price below the 10, 20, 50 and 100-day EMAs. TradingView's aggregate moving-average rating reads strong sell.

Two observations that pull in opposite directions, which is the honest state of the evidence:

• Supportive: a stochastic under 10 is a genuine extreme. QQQ remains above its 200-day EMA (648.88) and 200-day SMA (644.14). The primary uptrend is intact; this is a correction within it, so far.
• Cautionary: ADX at 26 says the downtrend has genuine strength behind it, not just noise. Oversold in a trending market is not a signal — it's a description. Prices can stay oversold for weeks, and the 2022 analogue is instructive: RSI below 35 was reached repeatedly on the way down.

The level that matters: 644–649, where the 200-day EMA and SMA converge, roughly 2.5% below spot. That's the line separating "correction in an uptrend" from something requiring a different playbook. I'd rather see how price behaves there than guess in advance.

3. What the Macro Health Composite says

My Macro Stock Market Health Composite reads the economic series rather than the tape, which makes it useful precisely when the tape is loud. Its most recent monthly state: score +6, MACRO BULL, with ISM PMI at 53.1, consumer sentiment at 45.1 (washout territory) and building permits contributing −1 with a late-cycle divergence flag set to YES.

That's the crucial nuance. The composite is bullish on the aggregate while explicitly flagging late-cycle divergence — employment rising while building permits fall. Historically that combination has appeared before, not after, the turn. The Building Permits Forecaster has permits at 1,374k, trend bearish, −2.1% year on year, with the long-run ARDL signal reading LATE CYCLE — REDUCE.

Today's homebuilder move fits that: XHB down 4.5% and 15% off its high, with a strong-sell technical rating. The housing thesis I set out in Housing Cracks First is playing out in the equity of the sector before it shows up in the permit data.

4. The divergences worth watching

Two stand out, and they say opposite things:

Apple versus the complex. AAPL sits at an RSI of 66.8, within 2% of its 52-week high, with a buy technical rating, while Nvidia is 20% off its high and semis are down 25%. That is not a market rejecting large-cap technology; it's a market rejecting AI capex beneficiaries specifically. Apple is the mega-cap with the least direct exposure to the capex cycle. The selloff is discriminating, which argues for a thesis unwind rather than an indiscriminate liquidation.

Financials holding. XLF has an RSI of 60.7 and sits 1.6% from its 52-week high, with a positive technical rating, on a day the market fell 1.5%. In my July report I flagged XLF as stretched at RSI 76 into bank earnings. It has consolidated rather than broken. Banks holding up while long bonds sell off is consistent with a curve steepening that benefits net interest margin — a coherent story rather than an anomaly.

Tesla is the opposite case: RSI 25.4, printing a new 52-week low, 40% off its high. That's not the AI trade — that's an idiosyncratic problem in a name that had been carried by the same risk appetite.

5. Where the order-flow tools apply

In a tape like this, the level-based work has an unusually clean application. My 503-session study found that on first touch, prior-day low held 57.8% of the time and prior-week low 55.4% — the only two levels with a genuine edge, and both are support. Prior-day and prior-week highs were coin flips.

That asymmetry is worth restating in the current context: the levels with a measured edge are the ones being tested right now. But the same study carries the constraint — the edge is small, it requires order-flow confirmation via the sweep-and-reclaim trigger, and it only exists on the timeframe the pattern actually lives on (1–5 minute, not 30-minute). A 57.8% hit rate is an edge; it is not a reason for size.

6. The setup into August

What I'm actually watching, in order: whether QQQ holds 644–649; whether TLT stops making lows, which would restore the portfolio shock absorber; whether the Apple/Nvidia divergence persists, which distinguishes a thesis unwind from a market-wide de-rating; and the August ISM print, since a PMI roll-over from 53.1 would flip the macro composite from bull to something considerably less comfortable.

My positioning hasn't changed — still heavily in cash, trading only, as it has been since November. That stance has cost me upside for eight months. This week it didn't.

For educational purposes only. Market data as at 30 July 2026 via TradingView and subject to change. This is a description of my own framework's output and my reading of it — not investment advice, and not a recommendation on any security mentioned. Indicator readings are from the most recent monthly refresh and may lag the tape.

← All reports